000 01627cam a22002294a 4500
008 1975
020 _a0205044662
040 _aGAMADERO
_bSPA
_cGAMADERO
041 _aeng
050 0 0 _aQD251.2
_bM67
_c1975
100 _aR.T. MORRISON
_93655
245 0 0 _aSTUDY GUIDE TO CHEMISTRY MORRISON AND BOYD
250 _a3ra.edición
260 3 _aESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA
_bA and B
_c1975
300 _a‎677 pg
_bIlustrado
_c21 cm x 27.5 cm
520 _aGranting that we know the chemistry of the individual steps, how do we go about planning a route to more complicated compounds-alcohols, say? In almost every organic synthesis it is best to begin with the molecule we want the target molecule-and work backwards from it. There are relatively few ways to make a complicated alco-hol, for example; there are relatively few ways to make a Grignard reagent or an alde-hyde or ketone; and so on back to our ultimate starting materials. On the other hand. our starting materials can undergo so many different reactions that, if we go at the prob-lem the other way around, we find a bewildering number of paths, few of which take us where we want to go. We try to limit a synthesis to as few steps as possible, but nevertheless do not sacrifice purity for time. To avoid a rearrangement in the preparation of an alkene, for example, we take two steps via the halide rather than the single step of dehydration.
526 _aIngeniería Ambiental
650 0 _aQuímica
_948
700 _aR.N. BOYD
_93656
942 _2lcc
_cLIB
_e3ra.edición
_n0
945 _a1270
_bMaría Elena Olvera Picina
_c1270
_dMaría Elena Olvera Picina
999 _c8735
_d8735